ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON

Analysis and Comparison



Analysis and Comparison

Introduction

In the verse "Death of a Naturalist", Seamus Heaney appears to propose that humanisation and simplification of crucially foreign and incomprehensible phenomena often occurs through discovering and authority. Through the stunning compare in pitch and diction between the first and second stanzas, Heaney emphasizes how details of the rough reality and risk of natural hierarchies can shatter immature naïveté and esteem for the clear-cut alleviate and coordinated structure of nature. This concept is actually inferred in the title, "Death of a Naturalist," suggesting that a realisation of the bleak truths and aggression in natural organisations can suddenly end these simplifications; that it can shatter the child-like awe and elementary comprehending mankind tends to have in the main heading of an alien entity for example environment.

 

Analysis of the poem

“Death of a Naturalist” is worried with increasing up and decrease of innocence. The bard vividly recounts a childhood know-how that precipitates a change in the young man from the receptive and defended innocence of childhood to the worry and doubt of adolescence. Heaney organises his verse in two parts, corresponding to the change in the boy. By displaying that this change is connected with learning and discovering, Heaney is worried with the inevitability of the progression from innocence to know-how, worried with the transformation from the unquestioning progeny to the reflective adult.

The verse undoes with an evocation of a summer countryside which has the immediacy of an genuine childhood experience. There is furthermore a sense of investigation in “in the heart/Of the townland;” which is reliable with the concept of discovering and investigation inescapably premier to breakthrough and the worried perception of experience. To accomplish this Heaney not only recreates the air of the flax-dam with correctness and authenticity, but the diction is mindfully selected to conceive the result of immature innocence and naivety. The child's natural talking voice arrives over in line 8; “But best of all”. The vividness of his recount is accomplished through Heaney's use of pictures laden with phrases that elongate the vowels and have a certain weightiness in their consonants; “green and heavy-headed Flax had rotted there, weighted down by gigantic sods.”

The sound of the bugs which, “Wove a powerful gauze of sound round the smell” is expressed by the 's' and 'z' noise but furthermore, significantly, actions like a binding stopping the disperse of decay. The pictures of breakdown, “festered”, “rotted”, “sweltered” and “the penalizing sun” manage not appear to problem the young man in this first part (although they manage arrange us for the second part and the decrease of innocence); he takes a great delight in the sensuousness of the natural world. The onomatopoeic “slobber” competently expresses the boy's enjoy for the substantial world round him. We can farther glimpse how he outlooks this world by the phrases “clotted” and “jellied”; to the young man the frogspawn is like elite and jam, certain thing to be affected and enjoyed.

In part two everything ...