BROKEN WINDOW THEORY

Broken Window Theory

Broken Window Theory

Introduction

The “Broken Window” theory was first written by James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling in 1982. It focuses on fighting against crime and argues that crime should be fixed when it is in initial phases or earliest stages. The theory states that when vandals break two or three windows and get no punish, they will surely break more windows than that. Next, they might break into a building to steal its contents or set it on fire. Also, the argument can be made for looking the other side of the picture that is when citizens litter their community. The trash accumulates very soon then, they have a little inspiration to take care of their neighborhoods and they turn a blind eye to the shattered society and the crime increases. The theory stresses that handling of criminal activity in its initial stage is extremely important and its success has been proven. If the Police focus on minor offenses, it will frustrate criminals. Also, it would create an environment which is hostile and uncomfortable for criminals to operate (Andrews 2006).

Discussion

The term 'broken window' refers to a situation that if the broken window is left unnoticed then it is a sign that no one cares about the window and it may lead to more damages. Such disorders left untended signify that nobody cares to lead to fear of crime, increase in serious crimes and decay (Andrews 2006). The theory has put forward the following main points:

Minor offences and disorderly behavior can be as significant for citizens as felonies such as robbery, assault and rape; such issues increase the fear of crime.

The citizens act on fears, take protective measures and shape their lives on the basis of their fears.

They want something to be ...