Criminal Evidence

Criminal Evidence

Introduction

U.S. Law of Supreme Court offers the most comprehensive law rules to punish the victims upon charges. The U.S. law court is special because it offers certain rights to the accused or defendant as well. The U.S. Supreme Court has its law defined in such a manner that the court of law does not accommodate any witness or evidence which has been inducted in an unlawful manner.

The attorneys who present the case in front of the judiciary are people of great wisdom and they have the abilities to turn and twist tales to make false present as true and true can be fabricated in such a manner that it can be overlooked by the court of law.

Criminal cases are of extra significance in the eyes of law as in most of the cases the criminal activities are of an extent in which justice is only possible thorough punishment. For e.g. if a robber robs the bank he can be punished and the amount returned to bank but if a person kills someone the life of the other person cannot be brought back and the only solution to the crime is an equivalent punishment such as death sentence or life imprisonment at the lowest level.

When discussing criminal cases the element of most importance is the fact whether the crime was intended or accidental. When the crime is justified in these categories it is further categorized whether the intention was for personnel benefits or a homicide activity and similar categories like that. Criminal cases are listened and judged with extreme care as no innocent person should be punished for the activities he has not committed.

This point of considering each point important is used very efficiently by the attorneys to defend their clients. More than often it is ensured by the judiciary that sufficient evidence is available and the attorneys of the defendants try to hide the crime by eliminating evidence from the equation.

A similar case is being presented by the attorney to whom I am an assistant and we will be using effective legal means to ensure that the evidence against our client is not validated and acknowledged by the court of law (MILE, 1998).

Discussion

In this paper we will be discussing legal means to defend our client who has been accused as a homicide for committing a murder. A sufficient amount of physical evidence has been gathered by the police against our client. However, the method adopted by the plaintiff and the local police was illegal and unrightfully. We will be ensuring that the evidence is neglected by the court of law and for this I will be aiding my attorney to whom I am an assistant to seek legal means from the law books and to involve similar cases in this context.

The first agenda which my team will be discussing is to exclude the physical evidence from the case. At the same time we will be analyzing the prospectus of the plaintiff to challenge the court to introduce the ...