HEALTH AND SAFETY REGULATIONS IN UK & INDIA

Health and Safety Regulations in UK & India

Table of Content

Table of Content2

Introduction4

Aims and Objectives7

Objectives of Research7

Problems of Occupational Safety and Health Regulations8

Chapter Two: Literature Review11

Traditional Approach to Safety at Work11

The Accident at Work11

The Accident as a Limiting Factor of Production12

The Disturbing Incident as Functional14

Economic Implications15

The Accident at Work16

Security and Productivity18

Safety and Quality19

Control Risks to Safety Management21

Standardization System Safety Management23

Why should businesses supply adequate safety and health measures without regulations by the State?28

The Costs of Accidents or Diseases29

The Costs of OSH31

Approaches in the direction of Regulate OSH up on Free Markets32

Economic Incentives vs. Regulations32

Principles up on OSH33

Chapter Three: Research Methodology37

Chapter Four: Findings and Analysis39

Good Practices39

Maurya Sheraton & Towers39

The EPA 199040

Contaminated or Soiled Materials as a Result of Planned Action42

Categories of Waste42

The Law Relating in the direction of the Case44

Review of OHSA-Britain46

Occupational Safety Should Be Sponsored By Fisk Limited51

Safety Engineering Training by Fisk Limited56

Worksite Analysis60

Recognizing and Controlling Hazards61

Chapter Five: Conclusion63

Global Health Research66

Global Forces and Migration69

References72

Appendix78

Chapter One: Introduction

 

Introduction

It is known that the general obligation to ensure the safety and health of people contained in the Community and national rules, finds its specification in various duties among which is particularly relevant to manage the prevention of occupational hazards. This duty is structured around the figure of so-called, in the terminology used by the Framework Directive on risk prevention, protection and prevention services, designed to address the activities of protection and prevention of occupational risks in the company.

This effort should lead to the integration of prevention of occupational risks at all levels of the company and foster a genuine culture of prevention. However, the experience gained in implementing the regulatory framework, more than eleven years since the entry into force of the law already allows verify both the existence of certain problems that hinder their implementation, such as certain weaknesses in the content, manifested in terms of accidents, the accident rate subsistence claiming unwanted actions as deep as agile.

Thus, the core issue that revolves around the legal debate is none other than the determination of rules or criteria to sort the different types of organization of prevention provided for in Community legislation. In other words, if the widely cited article 7 of the Directive imposes an hierarchical ordering of the different forms of organization of prevention for the appointment of employees of the company.

By contrast, since the current regulations in force in Spain, seeks to assert a vision of prevention according to which the use of external experts offers a level of protection than other forms of organization.

Against this, the Commission denies that the issue under discussion should focus on whether the use of external experts or not necessarily contribute to improving the safety of workers, merely pointing out that the discussion of adaptation to the Directive should not be on the effectiveness of the mode of organization of prevention, but on the priority established by the Commission. In other words, the level of protection is not an essential criterion to be built on the organizational system of prevention, ...