Military Downsizing

Read Complete Research Material



Military Downsizing

Military Down Sizing

Military Down Sizing

Typically, we investigate the relationship between military downsizing and community growth. In addition, military spending represents only one aspect of the militarization of society and is an indication of costs, rather than results. For the analysis, of any empirical data and their practical application in the theory of state regulation is needed. However, the study of the economic effect of military downsizing is complicated by the fact that they are not considered as a distinct kind of economic activity (Troxell, 1997).

In the framework of the neoclassical approach, the state is seen as a rational actor, balancing costs and benefits of security in order to move closer towards the clearly defined national goals reflected in the social welfare functions. This approach can be criticized for unhistorical, to justify any action, a focus on supply factors, etc. He, however, opens up the possibility of developing models for content analysis, in particular, takes into account military expenditures in endogenous growth models. The representatives of this direction are considering military downsizing as an important factor influencing the production and has a real, powerful effect.

As part of the conventional direction, it typically focuses on the impact of military downsizing, such as changes in economic efficiency and the formation of powerful interest groups. The latter is traditionally defined as the military-industrial complex (MIC) and includes both individuals and businesses and organizations that effected from military downsizing. MIC with the pressure on the state apparatus contributes to the latter, even when there is no threat that would justify these costs.

Thus, changes in the global strategic situation open the possibility for developing countries to reduce military without sacrificing economic growth in the long run. Achieving tangible results disarmament will depend on many factors. At the same time, disarming, considered as an investment process that requires sound planning and is associated with certain risks.

Certain developing countries may also face some unique to the problems are limiting the potential result of reductions in military. Negative role in this regard, as a rule, are the presence of military regimes and militarized security, civil or regional conflicts, the use of armed forces for internal repression, etc. The international community must find ways to solve such problems.

Certain institutional structures in developing countries, especially the military-industrial complex, will provide resistance to reduce costs. Bureaucrats, politicians, representatives of the army, some importers and other forces are interested in purchasing arms and ...
Related Ads