Pro Universal Healthcare

Thesis Statement

This paper shall discuss the need of health insurance and how Pro Universal Healthcare is coming about it.



Introduction

The National Coalition for Health Care states that nearly 46 million people in our country don't have health insurance. (Health Insurance Costs) This poses many problems to American citizens, such as fewer years of participation in the work force, developmental losses in children with inadequate health care, and the increasingly high cost to public health care programs.

Pro Universal healthcare is the most reasonable solution to the current insurance crisis because it will insure that all citizens receive adequate health care, greatly reduce the current costs to public health care programs, and reduce total health care expenditure.

Discussion

It is safe to say that privatization will result in a decrease in the emphasis on prevention of illnesses and community-established health care. This will cause an overall decline in the health of society because companies, in an effort to decrease spending on care and augment profit margins for shareholders, will put the promotion of health and prevention of illness to a back seat.

This decrease in health prevention will result in patients coming back and spending more money than they must (Lancet, 782). Since, the private sector is primarily profit-motivated, it will ponder in domains of the state as well as amongst sections of the inhabitants where profits can be produced, if not maximized. Privatization is an additional means for the wealthy insurance companies to turn into richer as greed once again is ruining society (Tumulty, 26-31).

Another argument is that privatization will not reduce health care rates. The best available proof that privatization will augment spending is the American health care system, which is the most costly in the world yet leaves millions devoid of health care insurance.

On the other hand, the accessible healthcare system does encompass its disadvantages too. A government cutback has starved hospitals communities and other healthcare institutions of the necessary funding (Manchikanti, 10-15). The government is looking carefully in the direction of privatization as one way to take the burden off their back as well as counter the influence of reduced funding. A number of physicians and reviewers have called for privatization of our health care system, suggesting that the present system will fail to meet the needs of Canadians devoid of a combination of new financial resources (Mitka, 1425-1426).

It is argued that an option to purchase health care would provide additional resources to the system, comprising of the selling of services to US patients. Some individuals, especially privatization supporters also maintain that the principles of universality and equitable access in the Canada Health Act, conflict with a patient's right to choose to pay privately and with a physician's choice to provide special treatments to those payers. Privatization followers also say that this form of health care would relieve the pressure on the public system and thereby would gain all Canadians (Kindler, 168-172).

Alternatively the individual with less salary is forced to pay a higher co pay and ...