QUALITATIVE APPROACH

Qualitative Approach



Qualitative Approach

Qualitative Approach

The Qualitative approaches are limited around the qualitative model, as there are a number of uncertainties which they create regarding the insignificant usage of quantification. They particularly focus on the issues of wrongly putting interpretations in places where these are variable and renegotiable regarding the usage of contexts. In addition, using such methods can help to avoid the problem of writing over the subjectivities which are constructed internally, with a priori systems of interpretation which occurs, for example, through standard survey questionnaire or tool. Qualitative methods have also been adopted in cooperative forms of inquiry, such as the new paradigm approach (Denzin & Lincoln, 2007). Because they can play the role of a channel for bringing the association between researcher and the data under study for instance, by documenting the interpretation processes and collective discussion about the systems of meaning. This latter point reinforces the way that arguments of a qualitative paradigm are simultaneously part of the criticism if subject-object dualism in the philosophy and practice of science. Analysis of symbols, discourses or texts is qualitative and has given emphasis to the possibility of ever capturing completely the meaning of experience, conduct and events (Cousin, 2005; Elliott & Lukes, 2008).

Interpretivism:

In the middle of the twentieth century, Wilhelm Dilthey was a significant figure in the paradigm of the interpretivist, also known as the hermeneutic approach. He identified that the matter under investigation by the natural sciences is distinct from the social sciences, which involves people, and not the lifeless objects, can perform interpretation of their environment According to the practices of modern research, it can be said that it has been recognized that this means that evident information and values cannot be put in separate terms as apprehension of the information will ultimately be biased when it is formed based on the individual and also the events (Cousin, 2005; Elliott & Lukes, 2008). It has been acknowledged by the researchers that all the concerned participants who are engaged in the study, have their own meanings and expressions, interpretations, convictions and understanding of the world or the development of the research situation and there has to be an open attitude adopted by the researcher towards the behavior and beliefs of the participants, excluding the preestablished assumptions and suppositions related to the culture under study. (Mackenzie & Knipe, 2006)

When it comes to ethnographic methodology, these standards and beliefs are of great significance (Elliott & Lukes, 2008; Somekh & Lewin, 2005). Few of the researchers in the field of interpretivism also follow a social constructivist methodology, which was brought about by Lev Vygotzky around the middle of the twentieth century. It concentrates on the collaborative social process and procedure of interpretation and gathering. The research method of Interpretivism incorporates the use of focus groups and interviews and those methods which can provide as many variables for analysis as possible (Cousin, 2005; Elliott & Lukes, 2008). Interpretivism faces opposed views and criticisms as it doesn't give way to a ...