Social Ideology Conflicts



Social Ideology Conflicts

Introduction

The emergence of international conflict is inevitable when one state or group of states seeking to impose their interests to others, declares and seeks their monopoly prejudice to or not taking into account other interests. The scope of possible conflicting interests involved in a conflict, is very wide: from direct political (security, borders, etc.), to general economic, national, news, ideological and even religious.

Conflicts have always been an integral part of human existence. From ancient times to the present day people are confronted daily with the conflicts in the family, with the government, in collaboration with others. One conflict with another tribe, the slaves rebelled against the slave owners, the people of another genocide arranged for purely chauvinistic reasons. People, when confronted with certain collisions that occur between them, in the end, found by trial and error, the tools and methods of eliminating the latter. But it does not make sense of the phenomenon of conflict, its foundation, and the resolution. Man for centuries was inherently much work and too little thinking (Dahrendorf, 2005).

Discussion

Revival of nationalism and religious fundamentalism in the contemporary world political analysts interpret differently. Some see this as enhancing the civilizational identity, state the change of class and ideological conflicts, ethnic and religious (C. Huntington). Others, however, believe that we are witnessing today destructive tendencies, the dip in the archaic ethnocentric point to a dangerous weakening of civilization - ethnic and confessional.

After the Cold War, the political scientists faced a difficult task - to develop a new paradigm that could identify the main source of conflict in the modern world, to explain the dynamics of the political process. C. Huntington proposed a model of a "clash of civilizations", which is clearly a challenge to the spirit of civilized tolerance. Debunking the myth of the dangerous bridge will facilitate the early modern world geopolitical deregulation associated with ethnic and religious conflicts on all continents.

Huntington's model is based on the fact that the international system primarily consists of three units - the "first", "second" and "third" worlds, now rebuilt and converted to the new system, which consists of eight major civilizations - Western, Japanese, Confucian, Hindu , Islamic, Orthodox Slavic, Latin American and African, Huntington believes that competes power blocks will become a distinguished membership of these civilizations (as opposed to nations and not to ideologies, as before): "... ultimately for the people is important, not political ideology or economic interests. Faith and family, blood and belief - it is something with which people identify themselves and what they will fight and die. So the clash of civilizations will replace the Cold War as a major factor of global politics. "

Different civilizations, from his point of view, produce different cultural values, which are much more difficult to reconcile than the conflict of classes as ideologies. "Velvet Curtain" culture in Huntington divides people is much stronger than the "iron curtain" of the ideologies of the Cold War. The fact that it is considered a ...