The Ford Pinto Case

Introduction

In this term paper, I will talk about the ford Pinto case, and how the data was denied from public in alignment to save business from gigantic losses and at the identical time hold company's status intact. I don't believe the conclusion of the ford business to with hold the data about the safety-issue of the car for which they were already cognizant of; was the right thing to do.

The Case Overview

If we were engaged in the Ford Pinto dilemma we would have utilized Deontological Ethical reasoning to conclude whether or not to reveal the hazard that the Pinto impersonated and/or use that reasoning to work out if or not to install the part(s) that would make the Ford Pinto safer. Our conclusion would be to do what is morally right and bypass doing what is morally wrong, despite of the outcomes. True sufficient Ford was not obligated by government guideline or any regulation, to reveal the promise hazards of the Ford Pinto although; at the smallest they should have offered the option of purchasing the part to make the care safer - an choice we would have made available to the clientele.

It is clear-cut Ford use the Utilitarian Ethical approach to come to their conclusion - selecting to do what produced the utmost allowance of good for the utmost allowance of persons; a subcompact car that cost $2,000 and weighing no more than 2,000 pounds (Ford & Newton, 2008, p. 296), traded to 11 million customers as opposed to the only 180 persons who lost their lives! Valuing a human life at $200,000 against a part that if individually purchased cost $11, Ford felt that it was less costly to resolve fatality assertions at $200,000 per life - so they thought, until jury's begun bestowing multi-million towns - so much for their cost-benefit analysis.

The Case Law

When an individual comes to a deduction on a decision, many times there are influences from out-of-doors causes that impact the choices made. In this case it is the need of nurturing about human life, death and suffering. If you drop into that class, humanity examines upon you with the utmost contempt.

People have usually accepted that death is a natural part of the human cycle. The difficulty is that persons usually arrive to easier terms with death when persons pass away of “natural determinants” and have dwelled a long and fulfilling life. Unfortunately, the Ford motor company not only accepted that death was something we'd deal with but to them, not enough of a priority to prevent. The value of a dollar was worth more than the value of life (i.e. one dollar and one pound).

During that time to some big businesses like Ford, the bottom line was to make money, and anything that prevented the maximum amount to be accumulated a problem. Unfortunately for them, society does not think that way. The value of life is the most precious thing that we posses. The vast majority of sound thinking ...