Will the Rehabilitation and Treatment of Criminals in Jails Help Reduce the Crime Rate after they are put out?

Introduction

People are dispatched to prison for committing a crime. The justice system drives an individual to prison to punish, rehabilitate and to avert misdeed; although, there is a very high recidivism rate amidst pharmaceutical and alcoholic beverage offenders and the brain ill. Additionally, the jails have been overcrowded and are evolving more so. According to the Bureau of fairness Statistics, "In 2008, over 7.3 million people were on probation, in prison or prison, or on parole at year-end 3.2% of all U.S. adult residents or 1 in every 31 adults." A rehabilitation center is where a person can go for help with alcoholic beverage, pharmaceutical, or mental sickness remedy and furthermore receive individual services from a counselor or therapist. These amenities can offer outpatient, inpatient, residential or expanded care counting on the individuals need. Additionally, there are state-run rehabilitation hubs and for persons with protection there are private ran rehabilitation centers. Some states, such as California have started sending non-violent drug lawbreakers to rehabilitation centers. There are many people who believe that jail is not rehabilitating the lawbreakers that go in and depart from prison, especially the replicate pharmaceutical offenders and brain ill. Many offenders are departing jail with their addiction troubles or mental illnesses untreated or any kind of referral for treatment after release. Treating drug-involved offenders provides an exclusive opening to decline substance misuse and decrease associated criminal behavior. Both Texas and California have endeavored two distinct incarceration policies, which have shown that rehabilitation works better. Texas started imprisoning youth lawbreakers with non-violent crimes for longer periods of time, wanting this would decrease their increasing amount of youth offenders. California took a distinct stance, putting their non-violent youth offenders in a rehabilitation center. According to the Center for Juvenile and Criminal Justice, the results for Texas showed that their stricter incarceration policy was unwarranted and new alternatives should be considered (Irwin, & Austin, 62)

Discussion

According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics (Beck, Karberg, & Harrison, 2002), in 2001, approximately 592,000 people were released to the community after serving time in prison. An inmate is released from prison in one of two ways: (1) through unconditional release after time served is complete, and (2) through conditional release, such as parole. The use of parole has declined considerably over the past 30 years, with the result that the percentage of all released prisoners returned to the community through parole has dropped from 72% in 1977 to 26% in 1996. Unconditional release does not offer the same opportunities to monitor offenders in the community as does parole. Though it is generally accepted that supervision level does not necessarily lead to reductions in offending, it is not clear whether individuals without supervision integrate as well as those under unsupervised release. There is evidence, however, that parolees are less successful at completing parole now than they had been in the past.

One of the primary objectives of ...