LEGISLATIVE ESSAY

Legislative Essay

Legislative Essay

Supplementary Prescribing

Supplementary prescribing (SP) or requirement "dependent" allows some health professionals, particularly pharmacists, nurses and dentists, after a pre-qualification and training, develop prescription drugs under a prescription plan designed by a physician whose work is the usual main prescription or non-dependent. This measure has been introduced mainly in the United Kingdom, from the conclusions of the Review of Prescribing, Supply and Administration of Medicines to ensure patients access to necessary treatment in the most efficient health care system. Indeed, the main UK's problems are the shortage of qualified professions to develop health care centres, where the qualified staff must be prescribing outpatients. However, after consultation with affirmative Drug Safety Council, the Health Ministry approve the Plan of supplementary prescribing.

Supplementary prescribing is operational in some special circumstances. In effect, the physician traditionally performed adjusted prescription based on the original diagnosis; both personal characteristics of the patient's physical and clinical aid practice guidelines, but also to ensure suitability (not just clinical) of medicine (Courtenay & Griffiths, 2004, pp. 215-20). However, often, the consumption of certain medicinal products is iterative and even in some chronic prescription is repeated over and over again for the rest of life. In these situations, accordingly, the activity can be supplemented prescribing physician (and not only as to complement now (for example substitution capacity generic specialties). This makes it possible to improve access of drugs to patients without a doctor's visit just to get the same prescription, as used to be common, but this can lead to problems and abuses. The SP has been discussed in drug policy, while it has recently been implemented in the United Kingdom as a measure to reduce the workload and improve the efficiency and quality of health care. Legally, for the realization of the SP, adjustments are required in the prescription according to the evolution of disease or illness, and the place where the prescription is made in their own outpatient centre or a pharmacy.

In particular, the argument behind the SP is to improve access by patients subject a continuous treatment, while intended to make better use of the knowledge of some professionals so far involved only in the dosage dispensing. It also permits the SP replace some tasks performed so far by other medical professionals, thus reducing the potential congestion in access to health care, which is free to the intervention in those new treatments. Logically, the doctor is forced to develop an initial task of designing a plan for a prescription determining time and its application may be limited by the patient's consent in this regard. The structure of the note which is detailed below, in the following section presents the evidence British and then provides an assessment to end with a final conclusion (Sodha & Dhilon, 2009, pp. 101-08). At first the British proposal restricted the ability of prescribed to patients suffering from asthma, diabetes, heart disease and high blood pressure, but the final list keeps only some exclusion are eliminated gradually. Approximately 1,000 pharmacists and 10,000 nurses develop this activity, and 71% of primary care centres (Primary Care Trust) will prescribe pharmaceuticals by 2005.

Legal Requirements

The UK Health department formulated certain rules and regulations to make SP ...