This paper is a critical analysis of the economic growth and development between developed, developing and undeveloped countries. The phenomenon of middle-income trap is presented by Indermit Gill, who was the former employee of World Bank. His analysis upon economies has presented a different and dynamic notion that has elucidated an exclusive debate over development of the countries; that where it is positive, it is negative also. To further elaborate his discourse, various economic approaches are used in this paper to in-depth study the phenomenon.
Discussion
There are various economical factors, which are associated with middle income that makes it a threatening state for any economy. Consider the phenomenon of spending and income; in a middle income economy, people are not poor but have some spending power, which instigate them to follow the path of innovators (Weston, C. 2009). Thus, a middle income group spend more than what it gets; thus, fall into the trap of financial bounds. Consider the case of Credit Cards, where a middle income individual always spend more than his salary, and purchase products on credit, which leads him to financial traps. Now put this example on an economy, a middle income economy always tries to follow the developed economy, thus, spend more on its infrastructure and industrial development than its net revenue. The concept of saving merely exists in middle-income sphere; whether economic or household based.
The Middle-Income Countries are ending up being an in an every expanding degree paramount constrain on the planet economy. Almost 65 percent of the planet's populace exists in the Middle-Income Countries. The weight of the Middle-Income Countries in worldwide investment action has been climbing. In the 1990s, the aforementioned nations explained 20 percent, very nearly one-fifth, of worldwide GDP.
As per Global Economic Prospects projections, their portion will ascent to more than one-fifth in the following decade. In purchasing power parity (PPP) terms, their stake in planet GDP is generally twice as towering.
Their allotment in planet sends out has likewise been expanding, climbing from 13 percent throughout the 1970s to 21 percent in the 1990s. The aforementioned nations likewise gain a lion's impart, 95 percent in 1990 till 1998, of net private capital streams to advancing nations. This stake in private streams remained enduring throughout the obligation emergencies of the 1980s and climbed fundamentally throughout the 1990s while their dependence on official streams declined.