PERSUASIVE SPEECH

War on terror

Introduction

“One death is a tragedy, one million deaths, statistics” -

It has been depicted by the statistics of the world that more people have been killed in the present decade than the cumulative causalities of the World War I and II. So the causalities in the war on terror are merely numbers, rather than, lives being butchered. There are thousands of civilians who are not the part of any war, yet they lost their lives, their hopes, their families to this war.

The war on terror commenced by the greatest economies of the world to spare the mankind is more for preparing a campaign that leads to the bloodshed of innocence. People losing their kids, wives losing their men and mothers cry for their sons, yet it is a war on terror, a terrible war. An initiate that is totally horrendous to the point that it ruins the fate of nations for centuries. The tragedy is that the nations involved in commencing and continuing the war are at no loss, since all the expenses for the war are funded through the charities and donations, and the war is being fought in the name of foreign policy (Flynn, 2007).

Point to Refute

The war on terror is based upon the premises of the eradication of terrorist organizations working in the world, in almost all of the Asian and African regions. The question is that the notions of the war on terror are more like entering the country, and disrupting the life of civilians in the first place. The invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq has been lately followed by no solid evidence and the NATO forces were not justified in the security of council, regardless of this, the power and conspiracy for Oil and resources led to the continuity ...