[Name of the Writer]

[Name of the Supervisor]

[Subject]

[Date]

Rhetorical Analysis: Obama's Contraceptive Failure

Introduction

Sullum highlights the inefficiencies of the birth control policies initiated by President Obama in February. Religious objection were considered by the president for birth control authorization. According to the administration, sterilization and contraception will be included in healthcare policies and religious organizations are obligated to provide them, even if they consider these practices unethical or immoral. President Barrack Obama wants every American woman access to free contraception. Obama fits that proposal after criticism from Roman Catholic side. But the adjustment is insufficient as Obama violates the religious freedom (Sullum, 1).

Thesis Statement

Obama pretends to accommodate religious objections to his birth control mandate.

Audience

Obama's contraceptive plan was a failure because it contradicts the religious values and institutions of local communities. Sullum's arguments are subjected to the religious organizations and policy makers. Therefore it is imperative that the author has criticized the administrative misappropriations and targets the general public to realize these inefficiencies. However, it is clear that when the author criticized Obama's administration they target audience would also include these authorities, as they should know about the inefficiencies of their policies and make amendments. Following statements by the author presents a clear indication of his audience. Sullum argues that, with the exception of women who work for a church for them is no compensation provided for contraception, not by the employer or by an insurer (Chapman, 509). Although it is expected that women who work for the church itself is not too much in favor of contraception.

Supportive Arguments

Obama's contraceptive plan did not work out as it did not go with the religious values and beliefs of the local communities. The author includes supportive detail and arguments in his essay. Sullum argues that, U.S. President Barack Obama has made ??some concessions in terms of full repayment of contraception for women. Following protests from religious and conservative America, the President decided that religious universities or hospitals are not obligated to their female employees to offer free contraception. Insurers will however be required to repay all the costs of contraception for women in a religious company. This shifts the cost, but not the intention: every American woman access to resources to prevent pregnancy. The conservative American always plays in the "First Amendment" to be too liberal to counter business. The first article of the U.S. Constitution prohibits laws that favor a particular conviction, because then ...