The Syrian uprising started off gradually with a small protest in Damascus, and caught snowball effect with the detention of teenage threatening graffitists in Daraa, against the prevailing regime. This led to a tremendous change in the decline of prevailing reign that inspired a successful military reaction that took place over just a few periods and gradually took across the nation with still no obvious end in perspective. One period since the protest started, the Assad system may still be in power but Syrian protestors team has customized significantly.
It is necessary to realize and internalize by the stakeholders that the people's upsurge, instead of defining the people as rebels, is the demonstration of their increased diminishing marginal utility in the services delivered by the state either in tyranny or non-tyranny. During the transition period of peoples' movement from Egypt to Libya two important events occur: First: it was either Gaddafi or one of his most trusted persons visited Egypt and met the new officials, and Second: two Iranian naval ships entered into Mediterranean sea. The initial impression was that the Middle East countries want to demonstrate their strength and solidarity with the existing regimes instead of with the people except Syria which in advance declares to carry out reform measures, later disbanded the Cabinet though which appears to work little.
One cannot define the people; protesters as rebels, because they did not wage the movement for freedom rather for democracy. It is intended not to bring information asymmetries through bifurcating real message of the mass upsurges bringing into changes in government in Tunisia and Egypt for the concerned policy makers on questions of democracy and democratic government. Looking into the Tunisian peoples' upsurge that sparked within a moment the owner being a graduate after vandalism of his mobile shop by the gangsters burnt him into death is the clear manifestation of the complete fermentation of the socio- structural, political and economical relations in Tunisia which got independence in 1956 led by the organized groups of civil society who are suppressed later. The Tsunami effect of Arab Spring all through Tunisia also indicates that Ben Ali though tried to retain his power but not for long and quietly leaves the throne with his closest allies particularly the family members. But there are two interesting features in Tunisia: the peoples' upsurge were led by the youth community as the front runner with the organized civil society groups behind, and (2) yet there are any symptoms to be seen that the interim government has created certain congenial environment to take the country after election toward building democracy in the country.
In mid-March of last year, Damascus was a tangibly troubled city. As information, videos and pictures distributed from the first screen in the old city regional list of al-Hariqa, a sensation of rejection abounded in the financial commitment. Perhaps out of worry or from a genuine wish for stability - rather than the issue that any citizen would carry ...