Case Study

Case Study

Food Stamp and Fast food

Basically, more than 35% of Americans adults that are around one third of the total us population qualifying as the overweight or comes under the problem of obesity. This question is quite tricky for the lower income population who are engaged in to receive of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or to be called it as SNAP that is formerly known for the food stamp. These receipts have been restricted to the using benefits from tobacco, alcohol, and other household products such as prepared food, medicines and restaurant meals. The major issue is occurs because health experts argues about expansion of Restaurant Meal program results many disease that are linked with consumption of fast-food that involves cardiovascular, diabetes and hypertension diseases are considered to be pervasive in the elder population. Unsurprisingly, there are a number of advocated that allows people to use the benefits from SNAP to eat the food that are dangerous for their health. The program known to be Restaurant Meal voted as the only strategy that helpful for hungry Americans all over the country that are engaged to produce alternate programs that increase healthy food for lower American people.

Both Utilitarian and the Kantian ethics provided the theoretical justification and view about the disparities as the wrong, for serving the ethical principles of the primary importance in bioethics.

According to Russo, (2008) the Kantian Ethics as it was based on duty ethical theory argues that the moral duty to addressing disparities of health because it would require the respect from all the persons that are violated from the significance presence and different in health. According to them people are more considerably with less health than the average White American who is not being much treated with the requesting respect and owed to the rational individual. From Kantian ground, health disparities are much significant wrong because the violation respected person is universally owed to the rational individual.

Weeks & Nantel (1996) argues that the utilitarian ethics are suggested the good of many can be outweighing of an individual if the balance of harpooners are gained by mass and comparable unhappiness single individual. This is involving to harm for reasonably larger group that is not outweighed and correspond towards the significant benefits. The health disparities are appears to be significant longer term detriment to the society as a whole. The major consequence of utilitarian reason is a major focus towards the problem of moral.

Yum Brand Social Responsibility

As company having more than 38000 restaurants have should feel their social responsibility to make not harm impact over the environment and remain environment much sustainable. Yum brand can increase their profit margin and also increase their shareholder equity while just made their focus towards reduction of environmental impact and they should also continue to serving the food as it featured by consumer love. The other major responsibility for this company is t offers their customer a quality product that does not affected people health and create a problem of obesity (Maignan & ...