Many legal scholars and experts have claimed that Yahoo! Did right in accordance with their terms and conditions and didn't breach their own policies. Yahoo! apparently disregarded the request that was done informally by the deceased family, and ask them to request through the court, "I would hope that the Yahoo! position here would become a trade practice - that e-mail would only be released if a judge approved it," says Gerald Ferrera, executive director of the Cyber law Center at Bentley College in Waltham, Mass. As far as Yahoo! is concerned, the company says that it is still behind each customer's expectations, and they stand behind the commitment that they have made earlier to treat each and every user's information and mails as private and confidential. Many people, when signing up for the account on the e-mail provider server, they hardly give their time in reading the terms and conditions of the e-mail provider, and directly clicks the “I agree” tab. However, thus, in result people unintentional tends to give their privacy in e-mail providers hand. Yahoo! claims that each account on the account holders name is non transferable, and the rights on to that Yahoo! account and I.D. and the beholders content present within the account automatically terminates upon the death of the deceased. “Destroying the data once the contract ends simplifies life for Internet service providers (ISPs), says Mr. [Alan Chappell].
Informational Privacy
Introduction
The conceptualization of privacy is not limited to the protection of information about one's self (informational privacy) but can also encompass notions such as bodily privacy, decisional privacy, relational privacy, communication privacy, and locational privacy. Furthermore, privacy is not considered to be an inviolate state but instead is recognized to be highly variant. That is, the need and concern for privacy can fluctuate by ...