5 PAGES PREBOOK

5 Pages Prebook

5 Pages Prebook

Social disorganization can be referred to as the lack of ability of a community to solve unceasing problems and realizing common goals (Kubrin, Weitzer, 2003). In other words, it can be described as a criminological theory pointing disparity in offense and delinquency over a period of time and between regions to the deficiency or collapse of collective institutions (e.g. family, school, or local government) and shared relationships that conventionally encouraged helpful relationships with people (Jensen. 2003). In such circumstances where relationship between institutions does not prevail, crime becomes a key component. The theory related to social disorganization states that it is caused by the effect of places rather than the effect of people. This can lead towards situations, which are either favorable or unfavorable of crime. The three most recently attributed mediating factors, which result in a social disorganization, include, social ties, collective efficacy, and organizational activism (Armstrong, 2010). However, the crux behind the advent of such kind of scenario in community is common problems resulting from poverty, residential mobility, and ethnic homogeneity that result in the prevalence of criminal attitude among the people of society. It tears down the internal and external structure of a society to dwell in crime (Lyman, M. D., & Potter, G. W., 2007).

Social disorganization is a form of anarchy that leads towards criminal behavior in community. Even though social disorganization is form in which a society as a whole retaliates against the norms of a territory, it can be somehow related to organized crime and its evolution. In organized crime, activities are conducted in groups and all the criminals are like members of an organization. With an illegal body, they conduct unethical and illegal acts majorly for the purpose of monetary profits. Criminal organizations can be politically motivated as ...