[Blackwater and Private Security in Iraq and Afghanistan]

By

Acknowledgement

I would take this opportunity to express gratitude my study supervisor, family and friends for their support and guidance without which this study would not have been possible.

DECLARATION

I [type your full first titles and last name here], affirm that the contents of this thesis represent my own unaided work, and that the thesis has not before been submitted for learned written test in the direction of any qualification. Furthermore, it comprises my own opinions and not inevitably those of the University.

Signed __________________ Date _________________

Abstract

U.S. departments and agencies assisting to battle or steadiness operations overseas are relying on personal firms to present a broader scope of security services than was before the case. The use of personal security contractors (PSCs) to defend personnel and house in Iraq and Afghanistan has been a subject of argument in the press, in assembly, and in the worldwide community. While PSCs are widely examined as being crucial to U.S. efforts in the district, numerous constituents are worried about transparency, responsibility, and legal and symbolic matters increased by the use of armed citizens to present security jobs formerly presented by infantry personnel, as well as the harmful influence PSCs may be having on U.S. counterinsurgency efforts. Contractors employed for the U.S. military, the State Department, or other government bureaus throughout contingency procedure in Iraq and Afghanistan are non-combatants who have no combat immunity under worldwide regulation if they enlist in hostilities, and whose conduct may be attributable to the joined States. Contractors who commit crimes in Iraq or Afghanistan are subject to U.S. prosecution under criminal statutes that request extraterritorially or within the exceptional maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the joined States, or by means of the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction proceed (MEJA). Section 552 of the John Warner nationwide protecting against Authorization Act for FY2007 (P.L. 109-364) makes military contractors supporting the equipped Forces in Iraq subject to court-martial jurisdiction, although the military test of a citizen contractor would likely be subject to lawful dispute on legal grounds. Despite congressional efforts to elaborate court-martial jurisdiction and jurisdiction under MEJA, some contractors may remain out-of-doors the jurisdiction of U.S. courts, civil or military, for improper conduct in Iraq or Afghanistan. This report discusses the operational framework that applies to Blackwater & PSCs in Iraq and Afghanistan. After giving a general description of the types of law applicable, encompassing worldwide humanitarian regulation and relevant rank of forces agreements, the report locations some significances of worldwide regulation and a multilateral proposal for the adoption of worldwide “best practices considering the use of PSCs. The report follows up with a consideration of jurisdiction over PSC staff in U.S. courts, whether government or military enclosures, identifying likely means of prosecuting contractor staff who are suspect of violating the law overseas in the context of U.S. military operations, encompassing a records of renowned situations that have appeared or are pending. Finally, the report succinctly talks about the possible implication of the functions of personal security contractors ...