DELAWARE CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION SYSTEM

Delaware Criminal Justice Information System

Delaware Criminal Justice Information System

Introduction

The Information Systems Plan of Criminal Justice System of the State of Delaware was release for dissemination on May 15, 1984. The ISP concluded sharing within the criminal justice sharing process”. The ISP Provides the impetus for subsequent efforts to integrate the criminal justice community in Delaware, but it would still take some time before implementation of an integrated CJIS Implementation of an Integrated CJIS was realize.

The mission of the Delaware Criminal Justice Information System (DELJIS) is to establish policies to protect the software, hardware, and data of the comprehensive integrated infrastructure, which in turn supports the criminal justice community. This may provide data protection legislation safeguarding the privacy and confidentiality of individuals, subject to the expanding limits imposed by security considerations. The Delaware justice Information System (DELJIS) commits to providing a system to improve criminal justice. (McLaughlin, 2008)

Discussion

Recognizing the Benefits of an Integrated Information Management System, DELJIS, comprised of all its representative agencies, commits to provide integrated components, along with information services and standards, whenever new or enhanced information systems, using shared information, are proposed or created. Information policies are critical to the development of today's society but are complex because they are influenced by legal, economic, and technological considerations, which are affected by social, political, and cultural contexts and vary from country to country. Data access policies have come recently in particular focus because they are closely related to funding mechanisms. This entry highlights some of tensions evident in this field (Ron, 2010).

Data access policies set by Delaware Criminal Justice Information System that comply with relevant legislation, such as data protection, and national security, where applicable, do not raise particular issues except where the data producer is a monopolist that uses its dominant position to impose conditions that distort the market and damage the wider interests of society. In many countries, one refers such a situation to a competition regulator, although in practice, the legal costs may deter small companies from doing so.

Since 1982, $ 8 million in State and Federal grants has spent on CJIS enhancements. The Federal grants, which came from the US Department of Justice, awarded under these programs: the National Criminal History Improvement Program (NCHIP), the Edward Byrne Memorial (NCHIP), State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Program, and COPSMORE. At the beginning of 1989, five separate databases were operating at the ...