ECONOMIC GLOBALISATION

'Globalist' Views on Economic Globalization

'Globalist' Views on Economic Globalization

Introduction

The "Globalists" infiltrate, corrupt, and turn around the world; country by country in a distinctive geopolitical scientific dictatorship, once installed it will be impossible to stop. The latest conflagration in the Arab world shows an acceleration of regional destabilization strategy to take over the charge of the destiny of each country. Nations like Russia and China, whose interests are getting threatened; they keep your pants down, unprepared, helpless. So it seems.

Some countries succumb in silence and shadow; others got invaded without mercy to be assimilated into the global agenda. Overlapping by global civil society amounts to a shadow government, subversive always creeping forward no matter how difficult that may be the target nation endures. In the most extreme cases, such as Libya, got uprooted civil society that military intervention was an acceptable and inevitable from the global perspective so easily sold to consumer's welfare.

The first few years of the twenty-first century witnessed a global economic boom and a dramatic increase in the intensity and extensity of global economic integration. It was no coincidence that this period also saw a wave of highly optimistic, liberal diagnoses of globalization and its consequences. As Bisley (2007:16) remarked the supporters of a largely economic version of globalization and those who present it as a positive and universal force are, at present, largely in the ascendancy. The renowned economist Jeffrey Sachs (2005), for example, recently argued that the latest dramatic round of globalization represents a momentous transition from an era of world economic divergence and North Atlantic dominance that prevailed between 1750 and 1950, to process of convergence. He suggests that the forces of divergence unleashed by the first industrial revolution and reinforced by colonialism have finally been superseded as globalization diffuses ideas and technological capacity.

In the light, of the recent turbulence in the world economy, some of the claims of this modern optimism have rapidly been exposed as exaggerations and statements of faith. What processes generated these ideas, and what remains of this interpretation of the consequences of economic globalization? In some contrast, economic geographers have been far more cautious and ambivalent about the implications of globalization. It may be true that, with some notable exceptions, economic geographers have made only a limited contribution to globalization debates.

Discussion

We must remember how these financial-corporate oligarchs got the power from the beginning through the control and regulation of our lives from the mere top. They did this because we have invested in their corrupt system for generations. We have given our monetary system and our personal responsibilities for the convenience of the life of "ready to eat" Corporate State and so it will remain in power. So we will continue submissive to your system. So continue to delude ourselves that if we dance with the puppets enough time we will become their masters (Benedek, Feyter, 2007, Pp. 127-131).

It is now well known that the last few decades of the twentieth century witnessed a spectacular integration of the global ...