Explain why Arthur Miller's “All My Sons” fits the model of a Modern Tragedy

Explain why Arthur Miller's “All My Sons” fits the model of a Modern Tragedy

Introduction

American Literature has experienced multiple leaps and bounds, irrespective of the advancements that have occurred and risen in front of us. Not only does it make way for giving out a lengthy description of the transformation existing in the realm of literature. For this paper, we would be assessing the literary work “All My Sons”, framed by Arthur Miller.

Modern Tragedy

Tragedy has been an important part and parcel of English Literature. While tragedy has been largely associated with pain and connoted with sorrow or something that causes hurt, there are multiple views related to the adoption and connotation of Tragedy in the state of English Literature. Portraying the multiple theories, many a great philosophers have been able to assess the concept of tragedy, narrating them in their own point of view.

Aristotle

Aristotle holds outstanding reputation when it comes to assessing the works and the way displaying the inner meaning of things that come with us. Not only does it make way for the challenges and the problems that have existed that have been done, Aristotle describes tragedy as an art. He suggests tragedy not being complex and that it must not arouse fear, pity or sorrow, for it would only cloud the purpose of tragedy that happens upon the pages of literature.

Hegel

Another view point has been given by G.W.S Hegel, the German philosopher, popular for his works in the area of epistemology and history. In his view, Hegel lays down a rather complex theory and belief of tragedy, which transcends on multiple levels, distinguishing Greek tragedy from that of Shakespearean origin.

For him, Greek tragedy refers to the clash of ethical forces; in the case of ...