FISA COURT

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

Introduction

Clear and Present Danger is a restriction of freedom of speech when it is considered a clear and present danger and affect people. Throughout history, affect a clear and present danger is evident. What Supreme Court cases in history have had significant meaning in a clear and present danger? What programs have been implemented by the Government to mitigate the instances of clear and present danger to the United States? What steps are taken to Congress concerning the supervision of alleged offenders? The answers to these questions will be discussed in detail and allow us to really understand what affects the clear and present danger has been in our country.

Debs v. United States - an example of Clear and Present Danger.

Eugene Debs was a socialist who has made two public speeches condemning capitalism and World War II and contributed to socialism. In 1918, Debs, the words "socialism answer, given in Ohio to twelve hundred people consisted of comments such as" I could not say that everything I think, but you should know that you are fit for that something better than slavery, and general food. "The Supreme Court used its clear and present danger test to ascertain whether the speech was a bad trend. (Linder, 2003)

During the speech, the growth of socialism and its success be predicted was the main theme. He began his presentation by stating that he had just returned from a trip to the workhouse, where three of his friends had to pay a fine because of their dedication to working-class community. Three friends were Baker, Ruthenberg and Wagenknecht. In the case of Ruthenburg v. United States, 245 U.S. 480, 38 Sup Ct. 168, Ruthenberg was convicted of aiding and abetting another in the absence of registration on the project. In his speech he said that he was proud of those who paid the penalty for standing up to improve conditions for all mankind. He continued, expressing opposition to Prussian militarism, which has hinted that he felt as the United States. He praised the loyalty to socialism, Kate Richards O'Hare who was convicted of obstructing the participation of service. Debs said that O'Hara was convicted on false testimony.

He said that the master-class people have always declared war and the subject class has always fought the battles of people with nothing to gain and everything, including their lives to lose. He continued, stating that the working class has never had a voice in declaring war, and in the ad world. According to him, "Do you have to lose your life, you certainly should have the right to declare war, if you consider it necessary war." Debs is illustrated by the growth of socialism, the prophecy of the international socialist crusade continues to support the success and the glorification of minority groups. However, Debs did not feel that his speech impediments war. He took the "Anti-War Proclamation and Program in April 1917 in St. ...