JUVENILE JUSTICE

Juvenile Justice



Table of Contents

Juvenile Justice1

Juvenile justice in United States1

Juvenile justice in China3

References5

Juvenile Justice Analysis

Juvenile Justice

Systems that can deal with children in conflict with the law differently from adults existed for over a century. They were born with the creation of separate institutions for juvenile offenders and juvenile "endangered", followed shortly after by the adoption of laws establishing separate courts for juveniles. Systems very different from each other long-standing but the prevailing approach is to focus primarily the fate of the child that is to say to his interests. This approach is based on the idea that any intervention must serve the best interests of the child, emphasizing its needs and not his actions, and based on the work of social workers who assist the court in a professional capacity. It is not uncommon for a juvenile justice system of this type is accompanied by various institutions treatment and education whose mission is to rehabilitate and reintegrate offender's juveniles or minors considered in danger. There are other types of justice minors; they rely on a judicial model that is much closer to the criminal justice adults, or administrative courts or other body's informal authority to try. Finally, in some countries, there really is no special treatment for children in conflict with the law. Consequently, there is a wide disparity in the forms and types of courts, interventions and institutions that make up the juvenile justice system and this assessment tool intended to apply to all these components (lawyershop.com, 2011).

Juvenile justice in United States

The International Secretariat of OMCT is gravely concerned about the deplorable state of the system of juvenile justice in the United States of America, including the application of the death penalty, life imprisonment and adult procedures applied to juvenile offenders. A few hours of the close of the Commission on Human Rights United Nations on April 25 this year, the U.S. again pressured to omit any reference to the death penalty in the resolution on the rights of the child - attempted rejected collectively by the entire international community (lawfirms.com, 2011). The Pardon & Parole Board of Oklahoma had also decided not to proceed with the petition for clemency filed for Scott. His lawyer, Steven Presson, present at the hearing, said he could not present a credible defense for lack of funds. In May 1988, at the age of 17, Scott was convicted by a court of Tulsa for the murders ...