The essay attempts to provide a theoretical framework on the topic of Modern forms of leisure are encouraging people to become lazy and obese and are, therefore, a long-run danger to the economy. This question is under economics of leisure we provide a brief overview of economics of leisure with reference to economic theory and appropriate empirical evidence. Then in the next section we provide a brief Modern forms of leisure are encouraging people to become lazy and obese and are, therefore, a long-run danger to the economy.
Active leisure activities involve the exertion of physical or mental energy. Low-impact physical activities include walking and yoga, which expend little energy and have little contact or competition. High-impact activities such as kick-boxing and football consume much energy and are competitive. Some active leisure activities involve almost no physical activity, but do require a substantial mental effort, such as playing chess or painting a picture. Active leisure and recreation overlap significantly.
Passive leisure activities are those in which a person does not exert any significant physical or mental energy, such as going to the cinema, watching television, or gambling on slot machines. Some leisure experts discourage these types of leisure activity, on the grounds that they do not provide the benefits offered by active leisure activities. For example, acting in a community drama (an active leisure activity) could build a person's skills or self-confidence. Nevertheless, passive leisure activities are a good way of relaxing for many people.
Obese is defined as the high number of fat or adipose tissue in relation to lean body mass. Number of fat (or adiposity) includes concern for both the distribution of fat throughout the body and the size of fat deposits.
The normal and characteristic occupations of the class in this mature phase of its life history are in form very much the same as in its earlier days. These occupations are government, war, sports, and devout observances. Persons unduly given to difficult theoretical niceties may hold that these occupations are still incidentally and indirectly "productive"; but it is to be noted as decisive of the question in hand that the ordinary and ostensible motive of the leisure class in engaging in these occupations is assuredly not an increase of wealth by productive effort.
My main reservation about Burke's approach to the first question is that it is biased: most of the time he seems to be concerned solely with the leisure of those who never worked. People might -- indeed, did -- fill their free time in ways which were essentially the same across classes, yet there were huge differences in the possibilities each individual had in that respect.
Peter Burke believes that the main problem confronting the history of leisure is the contradictory evidence for a `pre-industrial festival/ industrial leisure' dichotomy, on the one hand, and for unbroken continuity, on the other. As a solution he has hypothesized a process of `invention of leisure', extending over the whole of ...