Quiz-2

Read Complete Research Material

QUIZ-2

Quiz 2

Quiz-2

Q.1. What factors led to the emergence of the Chicago School of criminology and the social disorganization theories?

The aim of the Chicago Criminology theory school was moving beyond crime's plain hard line traditional descriptions, which was the main factor that directed to the Chicago School theories' emergence. Criminal behavior's early theories concentrated on the individuals, flaunting notions like born chemicals, crime being a rational choice and the physical characteristics like forehead size as crime predictors. The socialization idea was introduced by the Chicago school as a clarification for the criminal activities. It was maintained by the theories that a person is not merely a bad or a good person by birth- an individual is influenced by the social situations, society and the forces (external), which the person is surrounded with (Short, 2002). The main factor the led to the emergence of the theory of social disorganization was the disproportionate quantity of economic and social hardship in addition to the criminal activity level, which takes place in the inner parts of a city as compared to the rest of the city parts. Social disorganization is the unvarying incursion of businesses and people into inner parts of the city together with the widespread poverty and vastly transient environment that directs to a breakdown of schools, families and different social institutions, which persuade on conforming it (Kubrin & Weitzer, 2003).

Q.2. Specifically, why did Strain theorists Merton and Agnew disagree with the tenets posited in the Chicago School?

Within the strain tradition, Robert Agnew, a persistent writer views strain as causing because of the adverse links within which people sense that they are being badly treated. Such adverse links might appear in a number of types: People stopping from goal achievements like monetary success; activities, which intimidate for removing valued relationships, like the death or loss of an important person; and the intimidation of stimuli that are negatively valued like physical assault and insults. For few people, these sorts of activities amplify the probability for frustration and anger, in addition to the probability of crime becoming a way to resolve such feelings. Agnew disagreed with the tenets posited in the Chicago School because he claimed that criminal behavior was more amongst people who experienced adverse event in their lives, for instance, financial problems or parental divorce. Also, for people that had interactional issues with parents, teachers, etc. The theory of conventional anomie (strain) was revised by Agnew as he went past the presumed economic strain (proposed by Merton) for distinguishing additional strain sources. Another reason for Agnew's disagreement with the tenets posited in the Chicago School was that Agnew viewed strain as a phenomenon that was much general as compared to the discrepancy amid expectations and aspirations. Agnew dissimilar to the tenets posited in the Chicago School identified three main strain types (Wareham, Cochran, Dembo & Sellers, 2005). Additionally, different strain types might:

Threaten or present for presenting a person with negatively valued or noxious stimuli;

Thwart one from achieving goals that are positively valued, and

Threaten or ...
Related Ads