TAURUS

Taurus



Taurus

Outline of the study

The main purpose of this essay is to make an analysis on the problem of Taurus which is a technology retailer and gave Xion 200,000 before delivery. The problem is that Xion presented the bill of 1 million to Taurus which according to Taurus is wrong as they have already paid 200,00 so they just have to pay 800,000.

Discussion

This is basically an unethical act by Xion, as Xion has already charged 200,000 from Taurus.

Client disputes over legal fees sometimes mushroom into ethical investigations of the lawyer's billing practices. This session will examine how courts and bar associations have addressed certain common fee issues (billing one client for drive time and another for phone calls made while driving) and uncommon ones (26 hour days). The discussion will emphasize the critical importance of communicating clearly to the client the basis for fees, and give examples of how lawyers have occasionally tried to exploit ambiguities.

It is considered to be a tort and defamation case from the Xion's point of view. n law, defamation—also called calumny, vilification, slander (for spoken words), and libel (for written or otherwise published words)—is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government or nation a negative image. It is usually, but not always,[1] a requirement that this claim be false and that the publication is communicated to someone other than the person defamed (the claimant).

In common law jurisdictions, slander refers to a malicious, false and defamatory spoken statement or report, while libel refers to any other form of communication such as written words or images. Most jurisdictions allow legal actions, civil and/or criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against groundless criticism. Related to defamation is public disclosure of private facts, which arises where one person reveals information that is not of public concern, and the release of which would offend a reasonable person. "Unlike [with] libel, truth is not a defence for invasion of privacy."[2]

False light laws are "intended primarily to protect the plaintiff's mental or emotional well-being."[3] If a publication of information is false, then a tort of defamation might have occurred. If that communication is not technically false but is still misleading, then a tort of false light might have occurred.

In most civil law jurisdictions, defamation is dealt with as a crime rather than a tort

Generally speaking, defamation is the issuance of a false statement about another person, which causes that person to suffer harm. Slander involves the making of defamatory statements by a transitory (non-fixed) representation, usually an oral (spoken) representation. Libel involves the making of defamatory statements in a printed or fixed medium, such as a magazine or newspaper.

Typically, the elements of a cause of action for defamation include:

A false and defamatory statement concerning another;

The unprivileged publication of the statement to a third party (that is, somebody other than the person defamed by the statement);

If the defamatory matter is ...