WHETHER OR NOT THE NURTURE DEBATE SHOULD BE CONTINUED OR ENDED

Whether or not the nurture debate should be continued or ended

Whether or not the nurture debate should be continued or ended

There is a problem that was presented to the philosophers in the past, and yet so scientists today. This question is whether heredity or environment plays a large role in defining and shaping human behavior. He is known as nature vs. nurture debate.

Numerous generations before us have discussed the causes of human behavior. There have been many theories formulated to explain why people behave as they do. Survivor's theories of behavior derived from physiological and sociological explanations. However, two explanations are not always compatible with each other. Renowned nature versus nurture debate human behavior as a result of conflicting views between proponents of the physiological (nature) and sociological (nurture) explanations. Throughout history, the study of the popularity of swinging back and forth between the theories. Nevertheless, theorists have broken the line between nature and nurture. Nowadays, people use as an explanation for the study of human behavior.

The path to our own time, early philosophers tried to understand human behavior. Already in 350 BC, such philosophers as Plato and Aristotle tried to understand the behavior. The question of nature or nurture as the primary disk can be traced back to these times. Plato thought, behavior and knowledge related to congenital factors. Author Fiona Cowie states, "argue that the nature of our mental furniture in the largely domestic rather than environmentally determined has found its first substantive defense in the writings of Plato ..." (De Waal, 1999). Plato suggested that all knowledge is present at birth. Plato also believed that the environment plays a role in human processes, but he thought it was a unique role. He believed the environment cannot teach people anything new, but its purpose was to remind people the information they already knew (De Waal, 1999). Although Plato's views are not supported today, he laid the foundation for other researchers to follow.

In addition, the philosopher Aristotle suggested different ideas about human behavior. He introduced the idea that human beings are born into the world with a "clean slate" and people's behavior and thoughts in connection with experience (Ashcraft, 1998). Unlike Plato, Aristotle suggested that people are not born with knowledge, but they acquire it through experience (De Waal, 1999).The idea of Aristotle's Tabula Rasa not believe today. Nevertheless, his belief that the environment is a vital factor in the behavior of an impact on many empiricists throughout history.

In the late 1700's, nature versus nurture debate began to heat up between philosophers. Internalists (nature) and empiricists (education) writes of literature and back trying to prove their beliefs and refute other theories. Two philosophers, the gross weight of Leibniz and John Locke, were the main representatives of their respected explanation. Leibniz contributed externalism point of view. Cowie states, "... the position of Leibniz in this matter, of course, that Tabula away from the race:" the soul originally contains the sources of ...