ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS

Assignment Questions



Assignment Questions

What role does embarrassment play in social order? Give answer with reference to Ervin Goffman.

The notion of embarrassment for us will be central in the name and the sequentialization trade repairers. Therefore, we deem necessary a brief terminology. Goffman, considering the embarrassment and social organization, distinguish two kinds of circumstances causing the trouble: First, "an individual can lose his head when he is engaged in a task that, by itself , it does not particularly important except that it is his interest to run with security, competence, diligence and fears of not being up to par. He feels uncomfortable in this situation and not vis-à-vis it. The lack of audience does not change anything and this is significant. Moreover, embarrassment can be "commensurate with the character that one size to those whose presence is felt at some point. This set of those present, with fluctuating contours, is a reference group of extreme importance" (Goffman 2005, 69 - 123).

This notion of embarrassment is understood here in the wider sense, the emotion caused by this kind of situation is not physically obvious, but it can be felt as a general malaise, as "something wrong". We consider that the difficulty is symptomatic of remedial situations, and it is for this reason that we have carried out their systematic review (Baumeister & Vohs 2007, 123 - 190).

According to Goffman, the function of the repair activity is to "change the meaning attributed to an act, transforming what could be regarded as offensive, as we can take for acceptable". The goal is to "restore balance ritual" of the interaction. We will limit the notion of reparation to a verb (the excuse, to symbolic), encompassing the procedures for both the neutralization of offenses, that instances of communication breakdown. The "speech errors" seem to be particularly lending redress in the context of TextTalk, where mutual understanding is still a fragile state (Goffman 2005, 69 - 123).

Embarrassment must not be confused with shame. One difference between embarrassment and shame that criminality is not dependent on a public development humiliation, while the criminality causes personal shame aggravated by the public aware of our actions. In the field of ethics, and especially in moral psychology, the debate is still open whether shame is an emotion heteronomous, that asks whether the shame per se imply a recognition of the negative evaluation that others can have on us or not . The philosopher Immanuel Kant and his followers claim that shame is heteronomous, while Bernard Williams and others contend that it is an autonomous emotion. Shame implies a moral response, while the ignominy defines the response to something that can be morally neutral but socially unacceptable. Another view on the subject argues that the two emotions overlap in a continuum, although differing in intensity (Baumeister & Vohs 2007, 123 - 190).

Explain Parsons views on the functional perquisites of social system (AGIL) how did Habermas reinterpret this.

Parsons is known in the history of sociology, as the author of the structural ...