Coroner Vs. Medical Examiner

Read Complete Research Material



Coroner VS. Medical Examiner

Coroner VS. Medical Examiner

Introduction

There are various advantages and disadvantages of a coroner and a medical examiner. Coroner is an officer in a country, state, district or municipality who have the rights of monarch of private property. No qualifications are required to become a coroner and he or she is an officer that is an elected official in United States. No training is required to become a coroner the only thing that is required is citizenship and residence. The duty of the coroner is to investigate with the jury on the bodies of people who are believed to have died by an accident or violence or those who have suffered from grievous bodily harm.

On the other hand, Medical examiner is an officer who holds medical qualification and his or her duty is to investigate and inspect bodily injuries and deaths that might have occurred due to suspicious or unusual circumstances or to perform post-mortems. The duties of both coroner and a medical examiner is similar but the important thing is this that a coroner is not having any qualification but a medical examiner holds a medical degree along with professional trainings and certification in forensic pathology.

Discussion

There is a huge difference in the pay scale of a coroner and a medical examiner. A professional elected coroner can earn $40,292 - $67,870 in a year and on the other hand a professional medical examiner can earn $75000 - $200000 in a year in United States of America. There are various other benefits and incentives that a medical examiner can earn during his service while there are limited benefits for a coroner. This shows that the duty of a medical officer is more acceptable and valuable when compare these two professions.

The duty of the coroner is to convene an ...
Related Ads