Ethics



Ethics

What is Plato's notion of justice and how does it conflict with that of Thrasymachus?

The early Western theorists differ in their view of ethics. One of the main themes of debate, which arise from past ethical frameworks, is of Plato's and Tharasymachus' debate on ethics and virtue. . The theme of justice, set in Book I of the Republic, is particularly sharpened in the first response. Thrasymachus, which identifies with interest, the convenience of the fittest (338C). The fair is reduced and appears with what is prescribed by law enacted by the governor. Behind this question, see if the issue of governance of the city from the written law, agreed. Law that arises as a measure of justice and how condition of the exercise of power.

Therefore, analyzing the arguments that develop over Book I, our intent is to synthesize other issues that bind inevitably to the question, for example, the dialectic of physis and nomos and the possibility of reconciliation between them. It derives from the tension that occurs in ethical level, between autonomy and heteronomy, the political, between naturalism and legal positivism. Associated with this tension, the process called secularization and relativism of knowledge (Crisp et al, 2013).

As is the case with other aspects of his philosophy of ethics is not the subject of a specific treaty that it be addressed systematically. The fact that many of Plato's dialogues start with a question about virtue in general, or of certain virtues in particular clearly shows, however, that interest in the analysis of human behavior is not accidental in Plato (Crisp et al, 2013). As seen in his conception of the ideal city, the goal of human life can not be reduced to the satisfaction of their material needs, beyond these, the man should be the subject of a full development of his personality, according to the higher parts of his soul, the irascible and sound, in order to achieve happiness identified with the harmony of your life .

Justice and Ethics

If justice in the city is that each social class to do what you should do, justice in man also lie in every part of the soul must do. This implies that the good life for man is a life that needs are met "material" and "spiritual." As we saw earlier the idea that man must give back all that mean stuff or have something to do with physicality, defended in the Phaedo, will not be maintained in the later dialogues, in which the soul is no longer considered as a simple body-facing entity, and happens to be considered as an entity in which we can distinguish three different parts that explain, among other things, the psychological conflicts of human life, the various trends shaping nature. Understanding and meeting the intellectual needs must be accompanied by health, moderation in the enjoyment of material goods etc., which shows how the idea that Plato rejects in an absolute way the body is unwarranted (Gould, ...