Give Me Liberty or Give ME Death: Response for Question 1

Give Me Liberty or Give ME Death: Response for Question 1

Introduction

Born in Hanover County, Virginia in 1736, Patrick Henry was a symbol of pride in America's fight for independence in the nineteenth century. By profession, he was a lawyer, but he was engaged in every aspect of work related to the founding of America. He was a patriot, orator, and an active participant in the various freedom movements. 1760 was the year, when he came to appear for his examination of attorney at Williamsburg. From that day onwards, his life became an example for his other Virginia fellow.

The life of Henry revealed that he was the man of his words. He also claimed that king, who would reject any law made by the representatives of the people, was a tyrant not a father to his people. He also served in the Virginia House of Burgesses, where he was the member of the Virginia Committee, Virginia Convention, and Virginia Constitution Ratification Convention. As a governor of Virginia, Henry served five terms. He died in 1799 at Red Hill Plantation.

The speech under review was one of the most remembered speeches of Henry. Delivered in March 1775, it was a bold public statement of his opinions regarding the colony's course of action. Every word of his speech showed that he was a firm believer in citizen's rights. His words in the speech took such a sound effect that they marked the beginning of Virginia Revolution.

Call of Action

The speech was a historical moment, which encompasses many of the contemporary issues in America in the nineteenth century. He boldly argued about patriotism, slavery, and provided a number of biblical references to make it strong. In his speech, he also tried to motivate his Virginia fellow to rise against the British tyranny. In his views, the British rule was overpowering their prerogatives of freedom. They were curbing their liberty and violating human rights. Liberty, in his views, was a God-given right. He asked his fellow men to fight and struggle for the freedom of America, even if they had to use weapons for it. He stated:

“Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer on the subject?”

Henry's these words suggested that he was in a favor of using arms against the British ministry. In the review of the above statement made by Henry, he was justified in his need. History shows the number of examples in which freedom was fought with guns and weapons. The first way to fight for the struggle is to make talks with the ruling party. It is called freedom through dialogues. Henry's words gave the idea that dialogues had been made for the last several years, but they were not bringing any fruit.

In this context, he proposed the next option. Though, using arms in the fight for freedom might be an absurd idea for those who are breathing safely ...