Sorry! No results found
Please visit us back tomorrow as we add 10, 000 new research topics everyday!
About 10 results ( 0,38 seconds)
utilitarian rationale for punishment. What rationale do you prefer and explain why? Retribution has been defined as morally right and fully deserved punishment. The idea of retribution is aimed at the perpetrator, not at the victim, reflec...
retributivists, however, punishment is retrospective in nature, consistent with past criminal behavior is punished, and strictly intended to punish according to the severity of the conduct. The severity of criminal behavior can be calculate...
Dangerous Driving and Knife Crimes Introduction This paper is being devised with an aim of analysing the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012. Also validates the relationship between the Act and the punishment theory i...
Criminals should be penalized because they violate a regulation that other ones pursue and abide by. Offenders if not punished they will just wreck the humanity and the lawful privileges of those who pursue correct conduct. Penalty judgment...
development and breadth of organizational psychology of criminal justice. In a careful analysis of the organizational psychology of justice we can conclude that this subject area is an important branch of organizational psychology. In fact,...
retribution and just deserts, and/or in utilitarian theory, which advocates incapacitation, deterrence and rehabilitation. While the latter is designed to prevent future offending, the former is most concerned to respond to past offences (L...
The purpose of this essay is to evaluate whether Kant’s ethics support or oppose the death penalty, in light of contrasting perspectives. These include Marshall’s varying definitions of the term “retribution” and his purely retributive just...