[Are Homeopathic Remedies Effective in Treating Asthma?]
Would take this opportunity to express gratitude my research supervisor, family and friends for their support and guidance without which this study would not have been possible.
I [type your full first names and surname here], declare that the contents of this dissertation represent my own unaided work, and that the dissertation has not previously been submitted for academic examination towards any qualification. Furthermore, it represents my own attitudes and not necessarily those of the University.
Signed __________________ Date _________________
Are homeopathic remedies effective in treating asthma? Abstract
Complementary and alternative remedy (CAT) is progressively well liked with patients and health-care providers. In the western societies an expanding number of patients with asthma and allergy combine conventional and CAT. But health-care provider's knowledge about the different treatment models applied within the conventional health care system and alternative treatment is generally poor. 'Remedy model' encompasses comprehending of infection, diagnostic approach, treatment methods and anticipated consequences of treatment. Different remedy forms represent different social buildings of understanding. We present a conceptualization of general practitioners' (GPs) and classic homeopaths' (CHs) perceptions of their treatment forms in patients with asthma and allergy. This is a first stage of a study task conducted in Denmark to study prerequisites for connection building between conventional and alternate therapists. The research questions were: How do the GPs and the CHs recount their treatment forms for asthma and allergy? What are the dissimilarities and similarities between the remedy models? Is there an ordered attachment between the constituents of the GPs and CHs remedy models? Six GPs and 11 CHs took part in semi-structured interviews. The major difference is in the GPs and CHs descriptions of the reason of treatment.
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION7
Background of the study9
Research Aims and Objectives10
CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGY11
Understandings of asthma and allergy13
Differences and likenesses between the GPs and the CHs diagnostic approaches19
Differences and likenesses between the GPs and the CHs in their alternative of treatment21
Expected effects of treatment22
Differences and likenesses between the GPs and the CHs in anticipated effect25
CHAPTER 3: CONSIDERATION AND ANALYSIS28
Results of literature seek and analysis31
Balance of evidence: placebo-controlled trials32
Balance of evidence: relative trials33
Quality of released tests in homeopathy36
CHAPTER 4: CONCLUSION45
GPs and CHs self-critical attitudes48
Are the outcomes of the enquiry legitimate and transferable?49
Chapter 1: Introduction
To sceptics, homeopathy is an archaic and ineffective procedure of remedy that declares an implausible mode of action. In compare, the individual and collective know-how of homeopathic practitioners tints an assuring picture of its clinical effectiveness. Homeopathy's likely means of action stay intangible ideas, and it will be important ultimately to substantiate these. The principal matters for the present and direct future, however, are if there is convincing study clues that homeopathy actually does use a remedial effect, and if such an effect is remedy-specific. What comprises 'compelling evidence'? Numerous homeopaths are cheerfully maintained by their own thriving clinical experience: 'we know it works, so why do study to verify it?' However, if homeopathy truly enables people attain better health, then it is ...