Ethical Scenario: Workplace (School)

Ethical Scenario: Workplace (School)

1.Why is important to maintain good communication between evaluators and the stakeholders? What might happen if the communication were break down in an evaluation?

Ans.

Good, accurate communication of information is essential. Good communication through evaluators is an essential tool in a decision-making process in the workplace. According to some evaluators and stakeholders, it involves organization, collaboration, breaking down barriers, and the ability to read non-verbal cues. Without effective communication, unplanned misunderstandings can take place, leaving the organization weak to collapse. Proper evaluation in any firm or business industry is a key to success. Stakeholders who effectively communicate the decisions and mission of their company are generally successful because they exercise collaboration with the employees as to what works and what does not work.

It is authentic information that stakeholders and evaluators can change the situation. Their skills and communication can play a vital role in decision-making. Philosophical discontinuity in a business deal can take place any time. And if the communication breaks down in an evaluation it may create different problems for stakeholders and evaluators. For example, projects become failing, matters aren't resolved and promises aren't kept. In fact, it can also affect new products or orders.

For this reason, good communication is crucial for both evaluators and stakeholders. Nevertheless, professional skill or technique to communicate effectively with partners or team members does not come easily to many employees. Every business evaluator must learn to communicate at a very beginning. However, to effectively communicate complicated ideas, skills beyond simple conversation are required. One key component that is necessary when communicating vision with others is organization. Organization of what you want to communicate is necessary because it provides your listener with tools needed to understand the concepts that are provided. The organization of the conversation allows the listener to decipher the important details rather than dealing with the nonsensical information that may be included.

Explain what is mean by “going native” in which evaluation approach is “going native “most common? What are the advantages and disadvantages of “going natives”?

Ans.

“Going native” is a new concept in business word. Its meaning is logical and represents a flow of dialogues among two parties. The concept of evaluation approach is a key to corporate world. Another key component of “going native” is collaboration. Collaboration is crucial in “going native” because it serves as a two-way process involving an exchange of ideas. If a stakeholder tries to take control of the conversation, the evaluator or listener will most likely become offended, and therefore, will not be open to information, or vision, that is offered to them. The hallmark of good communication is the coherent verbal projections of your ideas, so that your listener receives the message that you intend to send.

There are so many deals that can hinder the process of evaluation approach. Thus, good communication can make it accessible. There may be language barriers, someone who feels some type of defensiveness, misreading one's body language, power struggles, self-fulfilling ...