Globalization

Globalization

Is Alexander Fordyce responsible for the American Revolution?

Alexander Fordyce, who was a Scottish banker, was alone not responsible for the American Revolution. Even though his irresponsible behavior was the reason a financial crisis started and that caused the East India Tea Company to sell tea to America, this reason alone was not enough to hold him responsible as there were other reasons as well (Aronson, n.d.). The people who vandalized the tea were responsible to a greater extent. This included Samuel Adams, who was put off by the fact that cheap British tea would come into competition with his smuggled tea and the British government, who performed intolerable acts that caused anger among the colonists which was far more than what could have been caused by cheap tea (Aronson, n.d.).

In his writing, Aronson also ignored the events that were closely linked to the Tea Party, which can provide a lot of useful information about the situation. Benjamin Franklin had offered that he was willing to pay the cost of the destroyed tea, but the Parliament refused his offer instead and showed that the Tea Party was responsible for dealing with issues that were more political in nature, rather than economic (Robins, 2006).

By saying that Fordyce is responsible for the Revolution, Aronson proposed that the British Tea Act was the main reason of the American Revolution which is not entirely true. When the British first arrived in America, they realized that they were in a region which had previously remained unexplored by the Europeans. They also realized that they were far from home and could make use of many opportunities to colonize the region (Carp, 2010).

Governors were soon selected for different colonies after categorization and the new governors started bringing new laws into enforcement. They exercised the freedom to decide whether ...