PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Project Management

Project Management

Abstract

Bryde (Bryde JD. Modelling project management performance. Int J Quality Reliab Manage 2003; 20(2):229-25) has presented project management performance assessment (PMPA) model. The model proposes six criteria for assessing PM performance; based upon the EFQM business excellence model. This paper examines what is the level of impact of these criteria over the project management performance (PMP) in Pakistani listed organizations. This paper also examine the scope of the association within different criteria of project management performance assessment (PMPA) model and with project management performance (PMP) in the Pakistani listed organizations and whether this association is significant, furthermore it investigate that to which extent different characteristics of PM performance, correlate with each other and with project management performance (PMP). It is concluded that the PMPA model have a potential use as framework to assess the project management performance, by conducting empirical study and checking the impact, correlation and association of the criteria of PMPA model and PMP.

Table of Content

Abstract2

Table of Content3

Chapter14

Introduction4

Background of study4

Purpose of the study5

Problem Statement5

Questionnaire5

Significance of Study6

Chapter 27

Literature review7

PM Leadership10

PM Staff10

PM Policy and Strategy10

PM Life Cycle Process11

PM key performance indicators11

Chapter312

Methodology and Result12

Sampling technique12

Response rate14

Variables16

Research model17

Research model19

Hypothesis19

Research findings20

Chapter425

Conclusion25

References27

Chapter1

Introduction

Background of study

Project management is today's spicy topic. Copious research work has been done but this field is so dynamic that every angle shows a different prospective of the subject. Since its commencement in the literature and its applicability, the world has shown tremendous progress. As erudition involves day by day in project so as stringency involves in managing these complex and gigantic project. To avoid the waste of scarce recourses has increased the errands upon the shoulders of management. So it is necessary to boost up the performance. But as performance is an intangible thing, especially in case of management performance, so choosing tools for assessing the performance is also a hard job.

Purpose of the study

The objective of this study will be “to find out relationship and impact of PM Leadership, PM Staff, PM Policy and Strategy, PM Partnership and Resources, PM Life Cycle process on project management performance”.

Problem Statement

The concepts of this study is not only help to synchronize the requirement of key project participants but at the same time it is marked it also contribute in other areas which can contribute to deployment of successful project management.

Questionnaire

The data collection was through questionnaires consisting of dependent variables (project management performance) independent variables (“PM Leadership”, “PM Staff”, “PM Policy and Strategy”, “PM Partnership and Recourses”, “PM Life Cycle Management”). The questionnaire was developed depending upon the extensive literature review. In the mentioned research studies likert scale questionnaire was used.

Significance of Study

After this activity, you will be able to:

Break a complex project into manageable sub-projects

Assign responsibility/ownership of project components

Set reasonable milestone's for the completion of major tasks

Perform a risk analysis and integrate mitigation into your planning

Develop and complete a project plan

Chapter 2

Literature review

The project can be defined as “a transitory venture undertaken to generate an exclusive outcome or service Barad et ...