Equal Rights For Gay Marriages

Introduction

 Since 1969 gays, transvestites and lesbians in New York have been rising up against the repression of police raids on the Stonewall uprising called the organized gay community which managed, internationally important rights, one of its major claims was recognition marriage between same sex. In North America, gay marriage is legalized in the Federal District of Mexico and in six jurisdictions within America: the Connecticut, Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Iowa, and Washington DC (Harris, p 330-332). Incidentally, this  legislation is far from being accepted nationally as many states passed amendments to their constitutions prohibiting the recognition of rights for same-sex couples. The most controversial is that of California, where gay marriage was legal for some months in 2008 by a resolution of the State Supreme Court, until Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger promoted an amendment which restricted marriage as the unions of only a man and a woman (Harris, p 330-332). Californians, in a plebiscite, approved the objection, so that the joints that were held in that period were considered to be in legal limbo.

Discussion

In most places that the legalization of gay marriage has reached political debate, provoked fierce controversy between it and those who believe that true equality of rights encompassing only get couples in the same legal concept and those who believe that the word marriage should be reserved only for the tying of the knot between a woman and a man. Moreover, without using the figure of marriage, quiet a lot of countries issued specific rules called legalized civil unions that recognize certain rights to spouses, attenuating the rejection of religious and conservative sectors (Wolfson, p 245-250).

U.S. President Barack Obama in early May in a spectacular interview known to his personal shift in consciousness and for the recognition of Gay Marriages announced himself pro marriage for gay couples. He had stated that, as gay couples responsibility to one another they should adopt children. So far even the transformation of individual experiences, beliefs and generations of politicians has driven yet the cognitive process in the CDU. Even the call for the full fiscal equality is sufficient to balance the stocks of conservatism in the Union to call again on the plan. Lawsuits may be filed against the discrimination of partners belonging to the same sex in the tax law. The fact, the full tax equal treatment for domestic partners and spouses, but also as a consequence of a legal development that has been driven in recent years, not only from Karlsruhe, but also of the CDU-FDP coalition. Same duties in the partnership and social law redress the state, equal rights in inheritance, compared with the salaries of civil servants and, as well as gift and estate transfer tax. The income splitting for income tax is in addition to the right to adopt the last privilege that only married couples are granted (Wolfson, p 245-250). The moment in which the state picks up only one of these last inequalities, there is no reason to refer not to the partnership in the law for what it is in the minds of most people it: ...